Comments on: Week Four-ish http://bleedtereoconnor.org/week-four-ish/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=week-four-ish Tue, 09 Jun 2026 11:33:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 By: Blog http://bleedtereoconnor.org/week-four-ish/#comment-15078 Blog Tue, 28 Apr 2026 04:43:50 +0000 http://bleedtereoconnor.org/?p=305#comment-15078 This post gives clear idea in support of the new users of blogging, that in fact how to do blogging and site-building. This post gives clear idea in support of the new users of blogging, that in fact
how to do blogging and site-building.

]]> By: Lets Talk http://bleedtereoconnor.org/week-four-ish/#comment-15077 Lets Talk Tue, 28 Apr 2026 04:22:46 +0000 http://bleedtereoconnor.org/?p=305#comment-15077 Wow that was strange. I just wrote an extremely long comment but after I clicked submit my comment didn't show up. Grrrr... well I'm not writing all that over again. Anyway, just wanted to say great blog! Wow that was strange. I just wrote an extremely long comment but after I clicked submit my comment didn’t show
up. Grrrr… well I’m not writing all that over again. Anyway, just wanted to say great blog!

]]> By: islamabad http://bleedtereoconnor.org/week-four-ish/#comment-15076 islamabad Tue, 28 Apr 2026 04:06:55 +0000 http://bleedtereoconnor.org/?p=305#comment-15076 Yes! Finally something about islamabad. Yes! Finally something about islamabad.

]]> By: Rent House http://bleedtereoconnor.org/week-four-ish/#comment-15075 Rent House Tue, 28 Apr 2026 03:54:58 +0000 http://bleedtereoconnor.org/?p=305#comment-15075 WOW just what I was searching for. Came here by searching for Rent House WOW just what I was searching for. Came here by searching for Rent House

]]> By: Bahria Town Islamabad http://bleedtereoconnor.org/week-four-ish/#comment-15074 Bahria Town Islamabad Tue, 28 Apr 2026 03:46:31 +0000 http://bleedtereoconnor.org/?p=305#comment-15074 Bahria Town Islamabad Bahria Town Islamabad

]]> By: cfstudio http://bleedtereoconnor.org/week-four-ish/#comment-15073 cfstudio Tue, 28 Apr 2026 03:46:05 +0000 http://bleedtereoconnor.org/?p=305#comment-15073 cfstudio cfstudio

]]> By: Video Editor http://bleedtereoconnor.org/week-four-ish/#comment-15054 Video Editor Mon, 27 Apr 2026 19:05:45 +0000 http://bleedtereoconnor.org/?p=305#comment-15054 Video Editor Video Editor

]]> By: Maggie Bennett http://bleedtereoconnor.org/week-four-ish/#comment-116 Maggie Bennett Wed, 31 Oct 2012 16:28:43 +0000 http://bleedtereoconnor.org/?p=305#comment-116 hi tere this sort of relates to structure. i'm interested in this blog as a time-trip, which your work always provides for me. There is this chronological structure unfolding for the blog, out of necessity i supposed, arranged in an more architectural pattern on the screen, in relationship and speaking to a history of dancemaking -- your own and the collective -- towards these dance performance moments in the future, which have some sort of looming, lurking presence inside all of this, and then these snippets of video that are in themselves singular in time, with all the language of yours, speaking to personal process, and jenn's language and writing, pulling from sources that traverse the realms of stimulation and experience and are often poetic in their nature. that's just a quick synopsis. and of course, in watching the videos, there are the dancers, and their presence, and their histories, which i do consider when watching, i think from the porousness of the frame (your language), which allows me to consider the material from your interests and my own, and just a very basic reading of "well, what's actually happening." all this adding up to say, this structure seems beyond the mathematical. there is a wonderful dominance of the geometric in your work, that for me creates the wonderful paradox between the here and the spiritual/ transcendent. the geometry of the material is "true," is from a language of numbers that explain our existence on earth and how that's happening. and the relational aspect of it defies any sense of knowing or known or needing to know. and how the rhythms and repetition of the geometry over time is actually what unfixes it's meaning, unfixes its marriage to the math, to the "known." i've been thinking of structure in a more horizontal way. away from that which is constructed. i'm not sure what is on the other side of that. it's not anti-constructivism (is that a movement?), perhaps it is speaking towards Constructivism, but i wonder what the contemporary version of that is... this blog, this opening of process, de-decntralizing meaning and inviting meaning to be created by the ways in which we ENGAGE with art and process feels like a nod to that. to contemporary Constructivism... i've been thinking of structure through huge spans of time. and looking for frames to hold the minute activity or experience that contextualizes it, appropriates it and places it in this much larger sense of "structure." i suppose i'm actually working with emergent structures. looking to the body to be a source of structure in itself -- to provide the technologies to build structure. to take on the technologies to build structure. perhaps there is a separation between solo work and group work as far as "structure" is concerned. i think this relates to this issue of control. i think i'm coming to understand choreography as simply systems of control... where one places control in the work, to what degree. it is so personal. it is what makes one's work her work, i think. where we relinquish control, where and when we assert it. that studio series of mine you saw when the musician abandoned the structure i had set up -- that was one of the most intense experiences of my life! and to make the choice to assert the structure, the control, in front of an audience -- to abandon the social for the structure. whew... it was a moment of the work cracking. to allow him to ignore the fine lines of control i had placed in the work was to loose the work. it was crazy to interface with someone who did not understand that. it was crazy to be forced to examine my own assumptions about how we communicate and agree upon structure, when it's not an outright choreography. when the structure is just a designated activity in a designated bubble of time. in terms of reigning it in, that you speak of, i think this story is about that. that the smallest assertion of control over activity and time can actually produce a huge architecture and structure, has so much power, and can communicate louder and resonate further than we realize. hi tere
this sort of relates to structure. i’m interested in this blog as a time-trip, which your work always provides for me. There is this chronological structure unfolding for the blog, out of necessity i supposed, arranged in an more architectural pattern on the screen, in relationship and speaking to a history of dancemaking — your own and the collective — towards these dance performance moments in the future, which have some sort of looming, lurking presence inside all of this, and then these snippets of video that are in themselves singular in time, with all the language of yours, speaking to personal process, and jenn’s language and writing, pulling from sources that traverse the realms of stimulation and experience and are often poetic in their nature. that’s just a quick synopsis. and of course, in watching the videos, there are the dancers, and their presence, and their histories, which i do consider when watching, i think from the porousness of the frame (your language), which allows me to consider the material from your interests and my own, and just a very basic reading of “well, what’s actually happening.” all this adding up to say, this structure seems beyond the mathematical. there is a wonderful dominance of the geometric in your work, that for me creates the wonderful paradox between the here and the spiritual/ transcendent. the geometry of the material is “true,” is from a language of numbers that explain our existence on earth and how that’s happening. and the relational aspect of it defies any sense of knowing or known or needing to know. and how the rhythms and repetition of the geometry over time is actually what unfixes it’s meaning, unfixes its marriage to the math, to the “known.”

i’ve been thinking of structure in a more horizontal way. away from that which is constructed. i’m not sure what is on the other side of that. it’s not anti-constructivism (is that a movement?), perhaps it is speaking towards Constructivism, but i wonder what the contemporary version of that is… this blog, this opening of process, de-decntralizing meaning and inviting meaning to be created by the ways in which we ENGAGE with art and process feels like a nod to that. to contemporary Constructivism…

i’ve been thinking of structure through huge spans of time. and looking for frames to hold the minute activity or experience that contextualizes it, appropriates it and places it in this much larger sense of “structure.” i suppose i’m actually working with emergent structures. looking to the body to be a source of structure in itself — to provide the technologies to build structure. to take on the technologies to build structure. perhaps there is a separation between solo work and group work as far as “structure” is concerned. i think this relates to this issue of control. i think i’m coming to understand choreography as simply systems of control… where one places control in the work, to what degree. it is so personal. it is what makes one’s work her work, i think. where we relinquish control, where and when we assert it. that studio series of mine you saw when the musician abandoned the structure i had set up — that was one of the most intense experiences of my life! and to make the choice to assert the structure, the control, in front of an audience — to abandon the social for the structure. whew… it was a moment of the work cracking. to allow him to ignore the fine lines of control i had placed in the work was to loose the work. it was crazy to interface with someone who did not understand that. it was crazy to be forced to examine my own assumptions about how we communicate and agree upon structure, when it’s not an outright choreography. when the structure is just a designated activity in a designated bubble of time. in terms of reigning it in, that you speak of, i think this story is about that. that the smallest assertion of control over activity and time can actually produce a huge architecture and structure, has so much power, and can communicate louder and resonate further than we realize.

]]>